Sunday, December 30, 2007

YOU WON'T BELIEVE THIS . . . BUT MAYBE YOU WILL (PART I)

I got this in an e-mail from the CENTER FOR INDIVIDUAL FREEDOM and I had to post this to get this information out.  This is absolutely unbelievable. I am copying the text as the CFIF sent it.

The federal government says employers MUST hire people who REFUSE to communicate in English or face the consequences.

Strange, isn't it... our government has a problem pursuing employers who knowingly hire illegal aliens but has no problem going after small businesses and nonprofit organizations that simply ask employees to speak English while they're on the clock!

First, liberals told us we had to give up our religion, even during Christmas and the rest of the holiday season:

No prayers in school...
No nativity scenes on the town square...
No mention of God at high school graduations...

Next they told us we had to give up love of our country:

America is racist and sexist...
America coddles the rich and exploits the poor...
America is the most dangerous nation in the world...

NOW THEY'RE DEMANDING WE GIVE UP OUR LANGUAGE!

That's right!  The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) is going after a Salvation Army thrift store BECAUSE IT REQUIRED EMPLOYEES TO SPEAK ENGLISH ON THE JOB!  The store even gave everyone a year to learn English. Two refused and were fired.

Here's what we're heading toward:

You go into a shoe store and the clerk doesn't even know the English word for shoe.

The waiter in a restaurant can't understand what you're ordering and brings you soft-boiled eggs instead of fried chicken.

A worker in a sawmill cuts off your right arm because he doesn't know the meaning of "STOP!"

This madness is one more consequence of allowing 12-20 million illegal aliens to pour across our borders unchecked.

This time, however, somebody is saying "NO MORE! ENOUGH!"

Senator Lamar Alexander (R-TN) has introduced a bill that -- if passed -- would stop EEOC dead in its tracks.

His bill would "make clear that it is not against federal law for an employer to require employees to speak English on the job."

Since Congress created the EEOC, it has the authority to tell it what to do AND WHAT NOT TO DO!

Hundreds of Businesses Harassed By The EEOC For Requiring English...

Here is what Senator Alexander says about his bill in a press release.

"A federal agency says it's illegal for an employer to require employees to speak in English, which, in plain English, means that thousands of small businesses in American would have to hire a lawyer and be prepared to make their case to a federal agency that there is some special reason to justify speaking English on the job.  I believe this is a gross distortion of the Civil Rights Act and a complete misunderstanding of what it means to be an American."

Lest anyone think this bill would force illegal aliens to speak English at all time, Alexander said this;

"This bill's not about affecting people's lunch hour or coffee break -- it's about protecting the rights of employersto ensure their employees can communicate with each other and their customers during the working hours.  In America, requiring English in the workplace is not discrimination; it's common sense."

In other words, people can speak in Spanish, Swahili, or any other language they wish during their personal time (lunch, coffee-breaks etc.).  Anyone who says otherwise is either misinformed or lying.

By the way, Alexander originally offered a similar bill as an amendment to the Commerce, Justice and Science (CJS) Appropriations Bill; and it was added to the CJS Appropriations Bill back in June by a vote of 15-14. 

And liberals squashed it!

A conference committee was to iron out differences between the Senate and House versions and send it to the President.

But the liberals, led by Speaker Nancy Pelosi, caved in to the advocates of illegal immigration and refused to bring the bill with Alexander's amendment before the conference committee.

Instead the radical and ruthless Pelosi presented an omnibus bill that gutted the amendment. 

Now Alexander's back with a free-standing bill that says the same thing. 

If this bill fails, the EEOC -- and liberals in government -- may declare all-out war against small businesses in America.

In fact, the EEOC filed 200 ACTIONS just this year against employers because they required employees to speak English.  Given the fact that small business contributes the lion's share of jobs and economic growth in America, this behavior is suicidal.

Press One For English

So how do the American people feel about the English language, as opposed to Nancy Pelosi and Barney Frank and Harry Reid and Teddy Kennedy?

According to a recent poll, 80 percent of Americans believe English should be the official language of the nation.

Nearly 90 percent believe it's important for immigrants to speak English.

More that 75 percent believe employers should have the right to require their employees to speak English while on the job.

Yet our own government is actively siding with people who REFUSE to even attempt to learn the English language.

How many times a day do you dial your phone and hear: PRESS ONE FOR ENGLISH; PRESS TWO FOR SPANISH? 

Our entire education system in many parts of the country has been changed to accommodate the children of people who speak languages other than English.

A North Texas friend tells us that virtually all the downtown signs in his city of almost 200,000 are now in Spanish.

America is a melting pot... so many of us had parents, grandparents or great-grandparents who came to the United States from another country.  

Did we make such concessions to them? 

When Italians immigrated to this country, did America immediately introduce bilingual education into its schools, with math taught in Italian?

When others immigrated, did towns and cities all over the country scrap English signs and substitute signs in German or some otherlanguage?

Did anyone ever dial a government agency or bank and hear PRESS ONE FOR ENGLISH; PRESS TWO FOR SPANISH?

More to the point, did the federal government EVER intervene on behalf of immigrants who refuse to learn English?

Everyone is supposed to be treated equally in this country. 

Teddy Roosevelt had it right when he said: "We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language."

Liberals Say Asking People To Speak English Is "Abusive."

Of course some folks think President Teddy Roosevelt was a blow-hard patriot.

For example, there's Laura Boston, who works for the Houston Interfaith Worker Justice Center -- an organization whose name tells you it isn't exactly conservative, or patriotic for that matter.

Ms. Boston says requiring employees to speak English is "an annoyance tactic" and "just part of abuse you sometimes get from some employers."

You have to wonder why employers would go out of their way to annoy their workers -- a tactic that would be bad for production.  In an automobile plant you'd be sure to get a few doors on backwards every shift.

Obviously Ms. Boston can't understand -- or refuses to understand -- why it would be good for business AND GOOD FOR MORALE if everyone at least attempted to speak the same language.

In fact, it is a good idea for people who wish to live in the United States on a permanent basis to learn English, since fluent English is the key to better jobs and a better life. 

Why do I have the feeling the Interfaith Worker Justice Center isn't really interested in that kind of self-improvement?

JustWho Are The Bigots Here?

The EEOC apparently isn't interested in the role that language plays in the life of our nation. 

The agency would obviously prefer to punish employers than to encourage employees to better themselves.

Columnist Michael M. Bates summarizes the larger role that language plays in our society -- and, for that matter, any society

YOU BELIEVE THIS . . . BUT MAYBE YOU WILL (PART II)

"Our common language is a basis for our cultural unity.  It's far from the only language spoken in the United States, but certainly it's the primary one.  For folks wishing to advance here, knowledge of it is essential.  We do immigrants no favors by bending over backwards trying to accommodate them in their native language, hindering their adapting to a new culture." [Emphasis Mine]

Those who think of illegal immigrants only in terms of economics -- i.e., the benefits they bring to a select segment of corporate America -- should study this paragraph.  It reflects the deepest concerns of those of us who successfully fought these same money grubbers in the U.S. Senate.  (And will do it again if they try to cram amnesty down our throats.)

Let's face it, hindering the adaptation of an immigrant to a new culture only benefits those who seek to EXPLOIT others by creating a permanent underclass in our society... it may benefit some businesses seeking so-called cheap labor... it does benefit liberal politicians who seek more government entitlements and give-aways. 

We love our country and we want it back -- what's left of it.

And we don't want our government persecuting benevolent organizations like the Salvation Army for requiring employees to learn English.

Use the hyperlink below to send your urgent and personalized Blast Fax messages to President Bush and the Republican leadership in the House and Senate.  Tell them to do everything in their power to pass Senator Lamar Alexander's "Protecting English in the Workplace Act of 2007" IMMEDIATELY.

The EEOC took action against 200 businesses this past year because they simply wished to require their employees to speak English on the job.  This campaign of federal government harassment must STOP!  Small businesses in America will be wrecked if the EEOC is allowed to enforce this further dismantling of America!

http://www.cfiflistmanager.org/salvationarmy.html

AOL Members Use This Link

If the above hyperlink does not function, please copy and paste it into the address bar of your browser.


 

Yours In Freedom,

Jeff Mazzella
President
http://www.cfif.org/

 

It's hard to believe that the Federal government would go after the Salvation Army.  But note that they have also gone after over two hundred small businesses the same reason. This is just one more example of how America as we know it today is slipping away.  We have totally abandoned our melting pot philosophy, at least as far as Spanish-speaking people are concerned.  They are not expected to learn our language and adapt to our way of life.  We are expected to accomodate them in every way. Just for the record: I don't mind immigrants coming here as long as they follow the rules and observe our way of life except of course, in their own homes as immigrants have done for generations.

 This is just my opinion, but this action by the EEOC to me looks like the government targeting small businesses to put them out and turn everything over to the large companies, much the like the Federal family farm land grab of the 1970's.  This would be foolish as according to the latest stats, 98% of all businesses in the U.S. employee less than two hundred people.  Small business is the backbone and foundation of American business.  But then again, when was the last time the government made good sense? 

 

Thursday, December 27, 2007

A DIFFERING POINT OF VIEW AND MY RESPONSE

For the first time since I started this journal, someone left a comment with a differing point of view.  I welcome differing viewpoints and was excited to see my first one.  So, in keeping with my journal's purpose, I am re-posting their comment and a response.  First I would like to thank the commenter who is THATBOYAINTRIGHT for stopping by and posting.  Here's his post from my previous entry, The War on Christmas Is Not Over:

"You don't know the whole story. The nativity was purchased with taxpayer money and decorated the area around the Mayor's church. That is simply wrong."

 

I researched this a little further and found out a couple of things.  First, the nativity was purchased by the city of Dallas, Georgia, but is located on public land according to the ALLIANCE DEFENSE FUND in a letter that was sent to the AMERICANS UNITED FOR THE SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE (AU) in response to their lawsuit threat to the city.  You can view the letter from AU by clicking HERE.  The letter from ADF in response to it can be viewed by clicking on this LINK.  According to the Alliance Defense Fund, the display met the U. S. Supreme Court's requirements for "public acknowledgement of the Christmas season."  The Nativity was not the only Christmas display along one of Dallas, Georgia's main corridors.  There were snowflakes, reindeer, Christmas trees, and other non-religious symbols of Christmas.  It would be physically impossible to see just the Nativity scene without seeing the other decorations.  Therefore, it was not an endorsement of any particular religion (Lynch vs. Donnelly, 465 U.S. 668 673 [1984]).  There are two other cases that sum this up very well:  ACLU of Kentucky vs. Mercer County, 432 F.3d at 638: "The First Amendment does not demand a wall of separation between church and state."  In Everson vs. Board of Education, 330 U.S. 1, 18 (1947), the Court held that the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment requiresthe state to be neutral in its relations between believers and non-believers.  It does not require the state to oppose religion or religious expression.  The letter from the Alliance Defense Fund to the City of Dallas explains it in much greater detail.  Please click the referenced link above and take the time to read it.  It's important to have this information as it is not publicized by the mainstream media for obvious reasons.  I still maintain that this was another attempt to promote an agenda.  That agenda is to remove all Christian symbols from the public eye.  I think attempts such as this are just a first step towards outlawing such displays on private property.  Don't think so?  If such legal actions are allowed and removal of such displays is forced upon the public against the will of the people, the next stop is your yard.  The liberal left does things in increments, never all at once.  It seems it's OK to deny Christians First Amendment protection just as long as we are careful not to offend non-Christians.  It amazes me that in less than one lifetime, our society has gone down the slippery slope of moral decay to the point where we even have such a conversation, the beliefs of the majority of Americans have ended up in the courts, and we're having to fight to even maintain minimal rights to express those beliefs freely. By the way, if you happen to question whether or not keeping the Nativity display in Dallas is the will of the majority, as of today there are 6,409 signatures on the petition on TAKING IT GLOBAL in favor of leaving the display.  You can still sign the petition if you wish, just click HERE.

 

Wednesday, December 26, 2007

LAHOMA WENT HOME LAST NIGHT

nativewolfPrincess of the moom wolves

SoaringHeart428

Most of you may already know, but we lost one of our J-landers last night.  At 9:50 p.m., Lahoma (LAHOMA'S LAMENTS) left this world and went home.  Lahoma has been a close friend of my wife's and I just wanted to post a few words in this journal.'

Lahoma understood the meaning of being a true friend.  When my wife, before we met, was going through some of the worst times of her life that no one should have to face, Lahoma was there.  There were times when Nelishia (PRAYING AND BELIEVING) had no family or friends to call on, and folks, I really mean NO ONE.  That's a place that few people have ever been.  Many think they have, but really haven't.  Nelishia had Lahoma.  Lahoma wasn't one to disappear when someone was going through hard times as many so-called friends do these days.  Lahoma was such an inspiration and comfort to Nelishia.  Physical distance separated them, but they are bonded like sisters.  For those of you who understand, Lahoma is a sister.

I believe Lahoma was given this time so she could make things right with God.  We were told that she had made peace with Him, and that is the most wonderful news!  A group from our church went and minstered to her recently.  It was by proxy because Lahoma was asleep and Robert didn't want to wake her.  But he allowed our church group to minister to her through him and he went back to the house and followed their directions.  I think Lahoma was granted this time so that could happen.  I will be eternally grateful that she had that opportunity.  The three of us will be together in just a little while, but Lahoma will be missed here.

                                                                           

Sanfords.net

Friday, December 14, 2007

THE WAR ON CHRISTMAS IS NOT OVER!

I have a couple of items about the War on Christmas.  We have seen over the past few years things coming to the forefront about eliminating Christmas altoghether.  Some of these things most people don't think about such as schools going on "Winter break" instead of Christmas break, stores not permitting their employees to say Merry Christmas replacing it with Happy Holidays.  It's subtle, and many people don't think anything about it.  The subtle approach is what the liberal left has used to advance their agenda over the years, and suddenly the majority realizes what's happened, and wonders how it happened.  The liberal factions always do things incrementally instead of all at once in order to virtually eliminate objections from the majority.

This appeared in a catalog put out by LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEMENT.  Lowe's has refused to call Christmas trees by their proper name, but "Family Trees."   There is one tree pictured upside down in its stand.  Don't know what that's supposed to mean.  In keeping with everything in my journal being properly sourced and researched, here's the link to the catalog so you can see for yourself:

 http://mediaserver2.afa.net/twb2007/lowescatalog.pdf

The next thing is taking place in DALLAS, GEORGIA.  Dallas is a small town in northwest Georgia.  It seems that a group of left-wing liberal extremists, calling themselves AMERICANS UNITED FOR SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE have somehow found this particular Nativity and are threatening to suethe city if they don't remove it.  Well, I know how they found it.  Liberals for years now have been bypassing the legislative process of this country that goes through Congress then the President.  These groups do this in order to bypass the will of the people and promote their own agenda forcing it on the majority.  They pick and choose issues and file lawsuits in the courts that typically end up at the U. S. Supreme Court.  The Supreme Court stepped outside the bounds of the Constitution years ago with their rulings.  If you check out the Constitution, Supreme Court rulings were NEVER meant to become law.  One of their chief functions is to INTERPRET the law, not BE the law.  These nine justices have been allowed to run this country for far too long.  This group is using the same strategy.  This is to continue the attack on Christianity and another attempt to take Christianity out of the public eye.  That has been the goal for many years now.  They use the fictitious "separation of church and state" as the basis for their lawsuits.  Time for a little Constitutional law.  There is no such statement in either the Constitution or the Bill of Rights.  The Constitution does say that Congress shall "make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof."  Our Constitution came from the Bible.  Our country was founded by people who were escaping religious persecution because their beliefs were contrary to that of their government, and wanted to worship as they pleased.  So, is there an "issue" with a community displaying a Nativity scene?  Absolutely not!  Non-Christians are not being persecuted by the government because of their beliefs.  If the Americans for Separation of Church and State need a "separation of church and state" issue?  I've got one.  Every year, every public school in the country, displays religious symbols of one particular religion to the exclusion of all others.  What religion you ask?  THE CHURCH OF WICCA.  When is it celebrated?  Around October of every year, Halloween is celebrated and Wiccan symbols are in our schools.  In the Wiccan religion Halloween is known as Samhain and is celebrated on October 31st.  Here is the link for a listing of the Wiccan holidays and sabbats:

http://www.geocities.com/SoHo/Cafe/1614/Celtwicc/Wicca/Wicca04.htm

Does the ACLU, the Americans United for the Separation of Church and State, or similar liberal groups have any objections?  No.  Their only objections are to religions that believe the Bible.  None other.  A prime example of this was when the ACLU sued a school over a Nativity display in their school library.  This was in the past year or two, and I think it was in Virginia although I can't find anything about it.  The ACLU lied in its legal briefs to the courts and omitted the fact that along with the Nativity, there was a Kwanzaa display, a Mexican holiday display, a Jewish display, and others.  In other words, it was a multi-cultural display.  But, the Christian display was the only one attacked.

The agenda is obvious:  remove any and all religious references and symbols from the public eye.  If this is allowed to continue, then the next thing will be having Christian displays in our own yards on private property removed.  The reason for this attack is that Christianity is the biggest threat there is to liberalism.  The idea is to do away with the threat.

By the way, there is a petition on TAKING IT GLOBAL circulating about the Nativity display in Dallas, Georgia.  So far, there are over 3,500 signatures wanting the Nativity to remain where it is.  The link to the petition:  http://petitions.takingitglobal.org/DallasNativity

Take a minute and sign it and help send these liberals back to Washington,D.C.

 

Saturday, December 8, 2007

PRESIDENT FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT'S "DATE OF INFAMY" SPEECH

Today is the anniversary of President Franklin Roosevelt's speech asking Congress to declare war on Japan.  In recognition of that, here is a copy of his speech.

 

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

 

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

 

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

Friday, December 7, 2007

DECEMBER 7, 1941 . . . A "DATE THAT WILL LIVE IN INFAMY"

Sadly, today is a day that most Americans know nothing about.  It will be just another Friday, go to work, come home, do some Christmas shopping, what's for supper.  If you did a street poll asking what December 7th was, I wonder how many would know. I suspect very few. The RedHawk Review reports that there are NO articles on MSNBC's front page commerating this day.  There is nothing on the front pages of ABC News, or CBS News either.  That's really something, but not surprising.  Before I go on, here's a video posted on YouTube.  Please take a few minutes to view it before reading on.  It gives just a little smattering of the impact of that day.  You will need to click on the Permalink below so the music video from September 11th won't play while you're watching this video.

Over 2300 Americans died that day.  Many more were wounded.  Eight battleships, including the USS Arizona were destroyed. 

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket There were far too many acts of sheer heroism to go into detail here. Suffice it to say that our servicemen responded in nothing short of the superhuman.  One man, Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket  Messman Dorie Miller (1919-1943), stationed aboard the USS Arizona, used an anti-aircraft gun to shoot down four enemy aircraft.  He had no training in the use of this gun. He received the Navy Cross for this and pulling his wounded Captain to safety.  All the ammunition was locked up and our men had to break the locks, load the guns, and begin returning fire in less than twenty minutes. Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket     This attack brought the United States into World War II.  Japan was attempting to expand its empire throughout the Pacific and attacked the United States so the expansion would not be opposed.  When Pearl Harbor was attacked, other strategic targets were also attacked such as Midway, Wake Island, Malaya, Hong Kong, Guam, and the Phillipines.  American ships were also torpedoed by Japanese forces on the high seas between San Fransisco and Honolulu.  The Japanese government thought this attack would keep the United States out of their way and they could take over the Pacific unopposed.  It had the opposite effect.  This was a time when our country had solidarity.  The vote in Congress to declare war on Japan was almost unanimous, only one dissenting vote. Boys lied about their age and enlisted to defend their beloved country. This kind of unity and resolve is something that is very much absent today.  America perservered for four long years until victory was won.  Today, I remember and thank all who fought and kept our freedom secure. Take time to remember - we must never forget. 

 

 

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket